Free Speech

Case - 366 U.S. 82

Parties: In re Anastaplo

Date: 1961-04-24

Identifiers:

Opinions:

Segment Sets:

Paragraph: 18 - We have also held in Konigsberg that the State's interest in enforcing such a rule as applied to refusals to answer questions about membership in the Communist Party outweighs any deterrent effect upon freedom of speech and association, and hence that such state action does not offend the Fourteenth Amendment.

Notes:

Preferred Terms:

  • (is) financial support of political causes
  • (is not) freedom from question of affiliation

Phrase match: upon freedom of speech and association

Source: http://freespeech.iath.virginia.edu/exist-speech/cocoon/freespeech/FOS_newSTerms_One?doc=/db/fos_all/federal/SC/1960s/19610424.366.US.82.xml&keyword1=freedom of&wordsBefore=1&wordsAfter=3#m1

Search time: 2017-10-13 13:47:37 Searcher: ars9ef Editor: ars9ef tcs9pk Segmenter: ars9ef tcs9pk

Paragraph: 36 - N120* The petitioner George Anastaplo has been denied the right to practice law in the State of Illinois for refusing to answer questions about his views and associations. I think this action by the State violated rights guaranteed to him by the First and Fourteenth Amendments.

Notes:

  • N120* / / / / The questions were about membership in the Communist Party

Preferred Terms:

  • (is) refusing to answer questions about views and associations

Phrase match: the right to practice law in

Source: http://freespeech.iath.virginia.edu/exist-speech/cocoon/freespeech/FOS_newSTerms_One?doc=/db/fos_all/federal/SC/1960s/19610424.366.US.82.xml&keyword1=right to&wordsBefore=1&wordsAfter=3#m1

Search time: 2018-01-12 14:48:12 Searcher: ars9ef Editor: ars9ef tcs9pk Segmenter: ars9ef tcs9pk