Parties: Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.
Date: 1977-06-28
Identifiers:
Opinions:
Segment Sets:
Paragraph: 20 - Of course, Ohio's decision to protect petitioner's right of publicity here rests on more than a desire to compensate the performer for the time and effort invested in his act; the protection provides an economic incentive for him to make the investment required to produce a performance of interest to the public.
Notes:
Preferred Terms:
Phrase match: s right of publicity here rests
Search time: 2018-03-15 12:38:56 Searcher: clm6u Editor: ars9ef Segmenter: ars9ef
Paragraph: 6 - N144* 'A TV station has a privilege to report in its newscasts matters of legitimate public interest which would otherwise be protected by an individual's right of publicity, unless the actual intent of the TV station was to appropriate the benefit of the publicity for some non-privileged private use, or unless the actual intent was to injure the individual.'
Notes:
Preferred Terms:
Phrase match: s right of publicity, unless the
Search time: 2018-03-15 12:38:56 Searcher: clm6u Editor: ars9ef Segmenter: ars9ef
Paragraph: 12 - N145* The Ohio Supreme Court agreed that petitioner had 'a right of publicity' that gave him 'personal control over commercial display and exploitation of his personality and the exercise of his talents.'
Notes:
Preferred Terms:
Phrase match: a right of publicity' that gave
Search time: 2018-03-15 12:38:56 Searcher: clm6u Editor: ars9ef Segmenter: ars9ef
Paragraph: 19 - N146* 'The rationale for (protecting the right of publicity) is the straightforward one of preventing unjust enrichment by the theft of good will. No social purpose is served by having the defendant get free some aspect of the plaintiff that would have market value and for which he would normally pay.'
Notes:
Preferred Terms:
Phrase match: the right of publicity) is the
Search time: 2018-03-15 12:38:56 Searcher: clm6u Editor: ars9ef Segmenter: ars9ef