Free Speech - Case - 455 U.S. 191

Case - 455 U.S. 191

Parties: In re R. M. J., No 80-1431

Date: 1982-01-25

Identifiers:

455 U.S. 191 (U.S. Reports)
102 S. Ct. 929
71 L. Ed. 2d 64

Opinions:

Majority: Author - Powell, Lewis Franklin, 1907-1998

Segment Sets:

Paragraph: 11 - In Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350, 97 S.Ct. 2691, 53 L.Ed.2d 810 (1977), the Court considered whether the extension of First Amendment protection to commercial speech announced in Virginia Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748, 96 S.Ct. 1817, 48 L.Ed.2d 346 (1976), applied to the regulation of advertising by lawyers. The Bates Court held that indeed lawyer advertising was a form of commercial speech, protected by the First Amendment, and that N135* "advertising by attorneys may not be subjected to blanket suppression."

Notes:

N135* / quote / endorsement / Q0459 /

Preferred Terms:

(is) advertisements for legal services
(is) commercial speech

Phrase match:

Source: http://freespeech.iath.virginia.edu/exist-speech/cocoon/freespeech/FOS_newSTerms_One?doc=/db/fos_all/federal/SC/1980s/19820125.455.US.191.xml&keyword1= speech protected speech&wordsBefore=&wordsAfter=#m1

Search time: 2018-04-12 08:37:53 Searcher: clm6u Editor: ars9ef tcs9pk Segmenter: ars9ef tcs9pk