Free Speech

Case - 479 U.S. 238

Parties: Fed. Election Com. v. Mass. Citizens for Life, Inc.

Date: 1986-12-15

Identifiers:

Opinions:

Segment Sets:

Paragraph: 46 - However, the corporation is not free to use its general funds for campaign advocacy purposes. While that is not an absolute restriction on speech, it is a substantial one. Moreover, even to speak through a segregated fund, MCFL must make very significant efforts.

Notes:

Preferred Terms:

  • (why not) Fundraised Dollars for Advocacy
  • (reg) Fundraised Dollars for Advocacy

Phrase match: restriction on speech, it is a

Source: http://freespeech.iath.virginia.edu/exist-speech/cocoon/freespeech/FOS_newSTerms_One?doc=/db/fos_all/federal/SC/1980s/19861215.479.US.238.xml&keyword1=speech&wordsBefore=2&wordsAfter=3#m1

Search time: 2017-11-10 14:59:38 Searcher: clm6u Editor: ars9ef tcs9pk Segmenter: ars9ef tcs9pk