Parties: Burdick v. Takushi
Date: 1992-06-08
Identifiers:
Opinions:
Segment Sets:
Paragraph: 46 - Petitioner's right to freedom of expression is not implicated. His argument that the First Amendment confers upon citizens the right to cast a protest vote and to have government officials count and report this vote is not persuasive. As the majority points out, the purpose of casting, counting, and recording votes is to elect public officials, not to serve as a general forum for political expression.
Notes:
Preferred Terms:
Phrase match: to freedom of expression is not
Search time: 2017-10-13 13:47:37 Searcher: ars9ef Editor: ars9ef tcs9pk Segmenter: ars9ef tcs9pk