Free Speech

Case - 528 U.S. 32

Parties: L.A. Police Dep't v. United Reporting Publ'g Corp.

Date: 1999-12-07

Identifiers:

Opinions:

Segment Sets:

Paragraph: 35 - For even though government may withhold a particular benefit entirely, it "may not deny a benefit to a person on a basis that infringes his constitutionally protected interests -- especially his interest in freedom of speech." Perry v

Notes:

Preferred Terms:

  • (is) access to government benefits

Phrase match: in freedom of speech." Perry v

Source: http://freespeech.iath.virginia.edu/exist-speech/cocoon/freespeech/FOS_newSTerms_One?doc=/db/fos_all/federal/SC/1990s/19991207.528.US.32.xml&keyword1=freedom of&wordsBefore=1&wordsAfter=3#m1

Search time: 2017-10-13 13:47:37 Searcher: ars9ef Editor: ars9ef tcs9pk Segmenter: ars9ef tcs9pk

Paragraph: 13 - Prototypical exceptions to this traditional rule are First Amendment challenges to statutes based on First Amendment overbreadth. N95* "At least when statutes regulate or proscribe speech . . . the transcendent value to all society of constitutionally protected expression is deemed to justify allowing N96* 'attacks on overly broad statutes with no requirement that the person making the attack demonstrate that his own conduct could not be regulated by a statute drawn with the requisite narrow specificity.'"

Notes:

  • N95* / quote / endorsement / Q0576 /
  • N96* / quote / endorsement / Q0577 /

Preferred Terms:

  • (reg) Challenging a Statute via Overbreadth

Phrase match:

Source: http://freespeech.iath.virginia.edu/exist-speech/cocoon/freespeech/FOS_newSTerms_One?doc=/db/fos_all/federal/SC/1990s/19991207.528.US.32.xml&keyword1= expression protected expression&wordsBefore=&wordsAfter=#m1

Search time: 2018-04-26 09:34:45 Searcher: clm6u Editor: ars9ef tcs9pk Segmenter: ars9ef tcs9pk