Free Speech

Case - 545 U.S. 844

Parties: McCREARY COUNTY, KENTUCKY, et al., Petitioners v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF KENTUCKY et al.

Date: 2005-06-27

Identifiers:

Opinions:

Segment Sets:

Paragraph: 98 - At other times, limits on governmental action that might make sense as a way to avoid establishment could arguably limit freedom of speech when the speaking is done under government auspices. Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of Univ. of Va., 515 U.S. 819, 132 L. Ed. 2d 700, 115 S. Ct. 2510 (1995). The dissent, then, is wrong to read cases like Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New York, 397 U.S. 664, 25 L. Ed. 2d 697, 90 S. Ct. 1409 (1970), as a rejection of neutrality on its own terms, post, at ____ - ____, 162 L. Ed. 2d, at ____ - ____, for tradeoffs are inevitable, and an elegant interpretative rule to draw the line in all the multifarious situations is not to be had.

Notes:

Preferred Terms:

  • (is) opportunities to exercise religion

Phrase match: limit freedom of speech when the

Source: http://freespeech.iath.virginia.edu/exist-speech/cocoon/freespeech/FOS_newSTerms_One?doc=/db/fos_all/federal/SC/2000s/20050627.545.US.844.xml&keyword1=freedom of&wordsBefore=1&wordsAfter=3#m1

Search time: 2017-10-13 13:47:37 Searcher: ars9ef Editor: ars9ef tcs9pk Segmenter: ars9ef tcs9pk