Free Speech - Case - 554 U.S. 60

Case - 554 U.S. 60

Parties: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Petitioners v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, et al.

Date: 2008-06-19

Identifiers:

554 U.S. 60 (U.S. Reports)
128 S. Ct. 2408
171 L. Ed. 2d 264
2008 U.S. LEXIS 5033
76 U.S.L.W. 4482
156 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11,043
184 L.R.R.M. 2385
21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 405

Opinions:

Majority: Author - Stevens, John Paul, 1920-
Dissent: Author - Breyer, Stephen Gerald, 1938-
Dissent: Joining - Ginsburg, Ruth Bader, 1933-

Segment Sets:

Paragraph: 58 - the Federal Government's refusal to provide food stamp benefits to striking workers was justified because "[s]trikers and their union would be much better off if food stamps were available," but the "strikers' right of association does not require the Government to furnish funds to maximize the exercise of that right").

Notes:

Preferred Terms:

(why not) Furnish Funds for Speech

Phrase match: strikers' right of association does not

Source: http://freespeech.iath.virginia.edu/exist-speech/cocoon/freespeech/FOS_newSTerms_One?doc=/db/fos_all/federal/SC/2000s/20080619.554.US.60.xml&keyword1=right of&wordsBefore=1&wordsAfter=3#m1

Search time: 2018-03-15 12:38:56 Searcher: clm6u Editor: ars9ef Segmenter: ars9ef