Free Speech

Case - 561 U.S. 1

Parties: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Petitioners v. HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT et al. (No. 08-1498) HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT, et al., Petitioners v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al. (No. 09-89)

Date: 2010-06-21

Identifiers:

Opinions:

Segment Sets:

Paragraph: 90 - (The First Amendment's protections of speech, assembly, association, and petition, N222* 'though not identical, are inseparable' " (quoting Thomas v. Collins, 323 U.S. 516, 530, 65 S. Ct. 315, 89 L. Ed. 430 (1945))); De Jonge v. Oregon, 299 U.S. 353, 364, 57 S. Ct. 255, 81 L. Ed. 278 (1937) (describing the N223* "right of peaceable assembly" as "a right cognate to those of free speech and free presses and . . . equally fundamental")

Notes:

  • N222* / quote / endorsement / Q0357 /

Preferred Terms:

  • (why is) Cognate Rights

Phrase match: the "right of peaceable assembly" as

Source: http://freespeech.iath.virginia.edu/exist-speech/cocoon/freespeech/FOS_newSTerms_One?doc=/db/fos_all/federal/SC/2000s/20100621.561.US.1.xml&keyword1=right of&wordsBefore=1&wordsAfter=3#m1

Search time: 2018-03-15 12:38:56 Searcher: clm6u Editor: ars9ef Segmenter: ars9ef

Paragraph: 89 - N284* ("Our First Amendment decisions have created a rough hierarchy in the   constitutional protection of speech" in which "[c]ore political speech occupies the highest, most protected position")

Notes:

  • N284* / quote / endorsement / Q0557 /

Preferred Terms:

  • (is) political speech

Phrase match:

Source: http://freespeech.iath.virginia.edu/exist-speech/cocoon/freespeech/FOS_newSTerms_One?doc=/db/fos_all/federal/SC/2000s/20100621.561.US.1.xml&keyword1= speech protected speech&wordsBefore=&wordsAfter=#m1

Search time: 2018-04-12 08:37:53 Searcher: clm6u Editor: ars9ef tcs9pk Segmenter: ars9ef tcs9pk

Paragraph: 91 - "Coordination" with a group that engages in unlawful activity also does not deprive the plaintiffs of the First Amendment's protection under any traditional "categorical" exception to its protection. The plaintiffs do not propose to solicit a crime. They will not engage in fraud or defamation or circulate obscenity. Cf. United States v. Stevens, 559 U.S. 460, 468-469, 130 S. Ct. 1577, 176 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2010) (describing "categories" ofunprotected speech). And the First Amendment protects advocacy even of unlawful action so long as that advocacy is not   N285* "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and . . . likely to incite or produce such action."

Notes:

  • N285* / quote / endorsement / Q0547 /

Preferred Terms:

  • (is) advocating for unlawful action
  • (is) speech not inciting unlawful action

Phrase match:

Source: http://freespeech.iath.virginia.edu/exist-speech/cocoon/freespeech/FOS_newSTerms_One?doc=/db/fos_all/federal/SC/2000s/20100621.561.US.1.xml&keyword1= speech protected speech&wordsBefore=&wordsAfter=#m1

Search time: 2018-04-12 08:37:53 Searcher: clm6u Editor: ars9ef tcs9pk Segmenter: ars9ef tcs9pk