Free Speech - Case - 134 S. Ct. 2056

Case - 134 S. Ct. 2056

Parties: TIM WOOD AND ROB SAVAGE, Petitioners v. MICHAEL MOSS et al.

Date: 2014-05-27

Identifiers:

134 S. Ct. 2056 (Supreme Court Reporter)
188 L. Ed. 2d 1039
2014 U.S. LEXIS 3614
82 U.S.L.W. 4386
24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 794

Opinions:

Majority: Author - Ginsburg, Ruth Bader, 1933-

Segment Sets:

Paragraph: 20 - It is uncontested and uncontestable that [**LEdHR4] [4] government officials may not exclude from public places persons engaged in peaceful expressive activity solely because the government [***19] actor fears, dislikes, or disagrees with the views those persons express. See, e.g., Police Dept. of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U. S. 92, 96, 92 S. Ct. 2286, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212 (1972). It is equally plain that [**LEdHR5] [5] the fundamental right to speak secured by the First Amendment does not leave people at liberty to publicize their views N131* "'whenever and however and wherever they please.'"

Notes:

N131* / quote / endorsement / Q0077 /

Preferred Terms:

(is not) absolute right to speak
(is) peaceful expressive activity

Phrase match: fundamental right to speak secured by

Source: http://freespeech.iath.virginia.edu/exist-speech/cocoon/freespeech/FOS_newSTerms_One?doc=/db/fos_all/federal/SC/2000s/20140527.134.SCt.2056.xml&keyword1=right to&wordsBefore=1&wordsAfter=3#m1

Search time: 2018-01-12 14:48:12 Searcher: ars9ef Editor: ars9ef tcs9pk Segmenter: ars9ef tcs9pk