Free Speech

Case - 134 S. Ct. 2369

Parties: EDWARD R. LANE, Petitioner v. STEVE FRANKS, in his individual capacity, and SUSAN BURROW, in her official capacity as ACTING PRESIDENT OF CENTRAL ALABAMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Date: 2014-06-19

Identifiers:

Opinions:

Segment Sets:

Paragraph: 13 - There is considerable value, moreover, in encouraging, rather than inhibiting, speech by public employees. For N132* "[g]overnment employees are often in the best position to know what ails the agencies for which they work." Waters v. Churchill, 511 U. S. 661, 674, 114 S. Ct. 1878, 128 L. Ed. 2d 686 (1994) (plurality opinion). The interest at stake is as much the public's interest in receiving informed opinion as it is the employee's own right to disseminate it." San Diego v. Roe,

Notes:

  • N132* / quote / endorsement / Q0078 /

Preferred Terms:

  • (is) dissemination of opinions by government employees
  • (why is) government employees are often in the best position to know what ails the agencies for which they work

Phrase match: own right to disseminate it." San

Source: http://freespeech.iath.virginia.edu/exist-speech/cocoon/freespeech/FOS_newSTerms_One?doc=/db/fos_all/federal/SC/2000s/20140619.134.SCt.2369.xml&keyword1=right to&wordsBefore=1&wordsAfter=3#m1

Search time: 2018-01-12 14:48:12 Searcher: ars9ef Editor: ars9ef tcs9pk Segmenter: ars9ef tcs9pk